The Paradoxes of Leadership, Pt. 4 - Creative vs. Focused
- Pete Ward
- Sep 17
- 6 min read
About the Author: Pete Ward - Partner, Rise Above Consulting
Pete Ward is a globally experienced founder and executive. After kicking off his career as a rock climbing rescue ranger, Pete then contributed to our foundational understanding of the mathematics of Neuroscience at university. Looking for the greatest possible positive impact, Pete brought that intellectual rigor combined with a fearless commitment to results into the business world where he has built his career as a leader. That career has spanned industries and continents and resulted in a truly unique perspective on how to build and grow profitable businesses. From New York to Oxford to Switzerland and from Tech to Financial Services to Retail, Pete has crafted high-performance strategies on the cutting edge regardless of context.
Would you rather be innovative or efficient?
Of course, we would all choose both if we could, but innovation is inherently inefficient with many stops and starts along the way. Efficiency meanwhile requires that we don’t waste resources on things we aren’t positive will work which… can be pretty stifling for innovation.
Would you rather do something new, or do something better?
Again, it would be ideal to be able to do both, but what is your natural tendency? Do you want to show that you are the best in an established category, or do you want to create a whole new category in the first place?
These are some of the questions faced in the paradox between creativity and focus. As with all the paradoxes of leadership, the complete leader needs to be able to have both traits when needed, but we all start with our natural comfort zone.
Previously, I introduced the concept of the Paradoxes of Leadership and the four core responsibilities of a leader. In the simplest terms, the work of a leader is as follows;
Make Decisions | Provide direction, commitment, and impetus to your organization |
Motivate Your People | Align your organization, clarify its purpose, and get buy-in |
Resource the Organization | Provide the tools, structure and assets that your people need to do the job |
See the Big Picture | Think strategically, and know when to be adaptable and when to be resilient |
Today, we will focus on how you resource your team by asking: What is the working environment that you create within your team or organization? Are you creative or focused?
Personally, as a natural creative, there’s nothing I find more frustrating than the way that the business world fetishizes LASER FOCUS. There is literally nothing more unimaginatively tech bro-y than puffing out your chest, taking a bunch of adderall and “rising and grinding” your way to the top. Cool, you can focus and grind things out, but do you even know why you’re doing what you’re doing or if it's the right thing to do in the first place?
The spark of innovation is one of the most exciting moments in any founder’s career, why snuff that spark out by demanding LASER FOCUS at all times?
Well, for one, because day dreaming doesn’t pay the damn bills. At the end of the day, we are what we DO, not what we IMAGINE, and the only way that anything gets done is through (say it with me) LASER FOCUS.
The most productive professionals and the very smartest people I’ve ever met can block out everything extraneous, identify what matters the most and create systems that outlast any one individual. As a natural creative, I hate to admit it, but great ideas are a dime a dozen unless you also have the LASER FOCUS required to turn your vision into reality.
This is why the paradox between creativity and focus is my personal favorite. And it’s one of the most difficult to manage as a leader. Success, both individually and for your organization, demands that you know when and how to bear down, cut away everything that doesn’t matter and focus on the most important issues, and when to understand that new pathways must be imagined.
Creativity is the spark that creates new categories. Focus is the discipline that turns sparks into fire. Without vision, focus is soulless. Without focus, vision is hallucination.
Ok. Tell me about the costs and benefits of each approach?
